Belarus vs Uruguay: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
Uruguay
0 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Uruguay rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.71 ha | 191.49 ha | 103.78 ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 4.97 ha | 84.45 ha | 79.49 ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.29 ha | 4.29 ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Belarus, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 0 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Uruguay ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.