Botswana vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Botswana
15,858 ha
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
318,904 ha
in 2024
Botswana rank
7th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Botswana
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 318,904 ha against 15,858 ha in Botswana, a difference of 303,046 ha.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 20.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 7th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 25,329 ha 957,190 ha 931,861 ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 16,988 ha 777,864 ha 760,876 ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 55,473 ha 607,510 ha 552,037 ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 12,015 ha 442,225 ha 430,210 ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Botswana or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 318,904 ha against 15,858 ha in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Botswana and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
303,046 ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Botswana ranks 7th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/botswana/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/botswana/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Botswana vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.