Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Ecuador rank
33rd
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,803 ha | 119.31 ha | 13,684 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 2,919 ha | 77.77 ha | 2,841 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 6.41 ha | 6.41 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.27 ha | 4.27 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Burkina Faso or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
- 21.37 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ecuador rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.