Burkina Faso vs Lithuania: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Lithuania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Lithuania
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,454 ha | 1.47 ha | 13,452 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 2,919 ha | 0.15 ha | 2,918 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Burkina Faso or Lithuania?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Burkina Faso and Lithuania?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Lithuania rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Lithuania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.