Canada vs Peru: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Canada
0 ha
in 2024
Peru
0 ha
in 2024
Canada rank
34th
Peru rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Canada
- Peru
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Peru, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,869 ha | 1,616 ha | 253.1 ha | Canada |
| 2000s | 258.74 ha | 97.54 ha | 161.21 ha | Canada |
| 2010s | 2.16 ha | 83.37 ha | 81.21 ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 38.48 ha | 38.48 ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Canada or Peru?
- Canada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Canada and Peru?
- 0 ha, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Peru rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Canada ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.