Canada vs Sudan (former): Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Canada
0 ha
in 2024
Sudan (former)
0 ha
in 2011
Canada rank
34th
Sudan (former) rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Canada
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,869 ha | 161,174 ha | 159,304 ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 258.74 ha | 33,725 ha | 33,467 ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Canada or Sudan (former)?
- Canada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Canada and Sudan (former)?
- 0 ha, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sudan (former)?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Canada and Sudan (former) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Canada ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.