Caribbean vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Caribbean
0 ha
in 2024
Chile
321.85 ha
in 2024
Caribbean rank
20th
Chile rank
18th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Caribbean
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 321.85 ha against 0 ha in Caribbean, a difference of 321.85 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Caribbean ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 632.75 ha | 3,672 ha | 3,039 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 174.8 ha | 995.63 ha | 820.83 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 17.13 ha | 2,022 ha | 2,004 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 1,828 ha | 1,824 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Caribbean or Chile?
- Chile, at 321.85 ha against 0 ha in Caribbean as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Caribbean and Chile?
- 321.85 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Chile?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Caribbean and Chile rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Caribbean ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.