Central Asia vs Chile: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Central Asia
0 ha
in 2024
Chile
321.85 ha
in 2024
Central Asia rank
20th
Chile rank
18th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Central Asia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 321.85 ha against 0 ha in Central Asia, a difference of 321.85 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,749 ha | 4,047 ha | 27,703 ha | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 4,613 ha | 995.63 ha | 3,618 ha | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 32.31 ha | 2,022 ha | 1,989 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 1,828 ha | 1,828 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Central Asia or Chile?
- Chile, at 321.85 ha against 0 ha in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Central Asia and Chile?
- 321.85 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Chile?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Chile rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Central Asia ranks 20th and Chile ranks 18th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.