Central Asia vs Congo: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Central Asia
0 ha
in 2024
Congo
85.48 ha
in 2024
Central Asia rank
20th
Congo rank
23rd
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Central Asia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 85.48 ha against 0 ha in Central Asia, a difference of 85.48 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 20th and Congo ranks 23rd of 31 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,749 ha | 1,839 ha | 29,911 ha | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 4,613 ha | 732.9 ha | 3,880 ha | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 32.31 ha | 168.83 ha | 136.52 ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 59.84 ha | 59.84 ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Central Asia or Congo?
- Congo, at 85.48 ha against 0 ha in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Central Asia and Congo?
- 85.48 ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Congo?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Congo rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Central Asia ranks 20th and Congo ranks 23rd of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.