China, Hong Kong SAR vs Peru: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Peru
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Peru rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Peru
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Peru, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.68 ha | 1,616 ha | 1,595 ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.1596 ha | 97.54 ha | 97.38 ha | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 83.37 ha | 83.37 ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 38.48 ha | 38.48 ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Peru?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Peru?
- 0 ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Peru rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th and Peru ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.