Comoros vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Comoros
21.38 ha
in 2024
Eswatini
0 ha
in 2024
Comoros rank
32nd
Eswatini rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Comoros
- Eswatini
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 21.38 ha against 0 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 21.38 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Comoros ranks 32nd and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.07 ha | 326.19 ha | 319.12 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 15.18 ha | 306.65 ha | 291.47 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 8.55 ha | 62.14 ha | 53.58 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Comoros or Eswatini?
- Comoros, at 21.38 ha against 0 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Comoros and Eswatini?
- 21.38 ha, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Comoros ranks 32nd and Eswatini ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.