Congo vs Côte d'Ivoire: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Congo
85.48 ha
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire
0 ha
in 2024
Congo rank
23rd
Côte d'Ivoire rank
20th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Congo
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Congo currently reports 85.48 ha against 0 ha in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 85.48 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Congo ranks 23rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 20th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Côte d'Ivoire in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,617 ha | 7,575 ha | 5,959 ha | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 732.9 ha | 519.33 ha | 213.57 ha | Congo |
| 2010s | 168.83 ha | 0 ha | 168.83 ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 59.84 ha | 0 ha | 59.84 ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Congo or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Congo, at 85.48 ha against 0 ha in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 85.48 ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Congo ranks 23rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 20th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.