Congo vs Nigeria: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Congo
85.48 ha
in 2024
Nigeria
106.86 ha
in 2024
Congo rank
23rd
Nigeria rank
21st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Congo
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 106.86 ha against 85.48 ha in Congo, a difference of 21.38 ha.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nigeria ahead.
Congo ranks 23rd and Nigeria ranks 21st of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,617 ha | 25,863 ha | 24,247 ha | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 732.9 ha | 4,873 ha | 4,140 ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 168.83 ha | 132.52 ha | 36.31 ha | Congo |
| 2020s | 59.84 ha | 205.17 ha | 145.33 ha | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Congo or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 106.86 ha against 85.48 ha in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Congo and Nigeria?
- 21.38 ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nigeria?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Nigeria rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Congo ranks 23rd and Nigeria ranks 21st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.