Costa Rica vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Costa Rica
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
34th
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Costa Rica
- Uganda
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.07 ha | 15,463 ha | 15,438 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 20.01 ha | 1,081 ha | 1,061 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.37 ha | 21.37 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Costa Rica or Uganda?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Costa Rica and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Costa Rica ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.