Cuba vs Papua New Guinea: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Cuba
0 ha
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
34th
Papua New Guinea rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Cuba ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 304.53 ha | 1,511 ha | 1,206 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 89.14 ha | 115.53 ha | 26.4 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 4.28 ha | 42.75 ha | 38.46 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 4.28 ha | 0.0065 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Cuba or Papua New Guinea?
- Cuba, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Cuba and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Papua New Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.