Ecuador vs Lebanon: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Lebanon
0 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Lebanon rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Lebanon
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Lebanon, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Lebanon ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119.31 ha | 8.07 ha | 111.24 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 77.77 ha | 0.2926 ha | 77.48 ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 6.41 ha | 0 ha | 6.41 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 4.27 ha | 0 ha | 4.27 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Ecuador or Lebanon?
- Ecuador, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 21.37 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Lebanon rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Lebanon ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.