Ecuador vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Malawi
21.39 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Malawi rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 21.39 ha against 21.37 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.02 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119.31 ha | 1,093 ha | 973.45 ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 77.77 ha | 468.78 ha | 391.01 ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 6.41 ha | 42.77 ha | 36.36 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 4.27 ha | 8.55 ha | 4.28 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Ecuador or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 21.39 ha against 21.37 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Ecuador and Malawi?
- 0.02 ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.