Ecuador vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
33rd
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Uganda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119.31 ha | 15,463 ha | 15,344 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 77.77 ha | 1,081 ha | 1,004 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 6.41 ha | 21.37 ha | 14.96 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 4.27 ha | 8.55 ha | 4.27 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Ecuador or Uganda?
- Ecuador, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Ecuador and Uganda?
- 21.37 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.