El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
El Salvador
0 ha
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
0 ha
in 2024
El Salvador rank
34th
Kyrgyzstan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 34th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.24 ha | 33.84 ha | 12.6 ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 19.18 ha | 2.65 ha | 16.53 ha | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- El Salvador, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 ha, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- El Salvador ranks 34th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.