Eritrea vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Malawi
21.39 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
34th
Malawi rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Eritrea, a difference of 21.39 ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 164.48 ha | 1,364 ha | 1,200 ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 30.77 ha | 468.78 ha | 438.01 ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 42.77 ha | 42.77 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Eritrea or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Eritrea and Malawi?
- 21.39 ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.