Eswatini vs Serbia and Montenegro: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Eswatini
0 ha
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Eswatini rank
34th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 358.1 ha | 40.22 ha | 317.88 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 414.67 ha | 7.43 ha | 407.24 ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Eswatini or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Eswatini, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Eswatini and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Eswatini and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 34th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.