Finland vs Kazakhstan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
34th
Kazakhstan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Finland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.36 ha | 30,003 ha | 29,965 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4.41 ha | 4,370 ha | 4,366 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 32.31 ha | 32.31 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Finland or Kazakhstan?
- Finland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Kazakhstan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Finland ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.