Finland vs North Macedonia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia
0 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
34th
North Macedonia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Finland
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.36 ha | 37.5 ha | 0.8624 ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 4.41 ha | 10.92 ha | 6.51 ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Finland or North Macedonia?
- Finland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Finland and North Macedonia?
- 0 ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and North Macedonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Finland and North Macedonia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Finland ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.