Ghana vs Nepal: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Ghana
0 ha
in 2024
Nepal
0 ha
in 2024
Ghana rank
34th
Nepal rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Ghana
- Nepal
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Nepal, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 34th and Nepal ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,818 ha | 522.59 ha | 10,295 ha | Ghana |
| 2000s | 1,139 ha | 21.25 ha | 1,118 ha | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Ghana or Nepal?
- Ghana, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Ghana and Nepal?
- 0 ha, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Nepal rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Ghana ranks 34th and Nepal ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.