India vs Papua New Guinea: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
India
0 ha
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 ha
in 2024
India rank
34th
Papua New Guinea rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- India
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
India currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was India ahead.
India ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,849 ha | 1,511 ha | 338.91 ha | India |
| 2000s | 256.05 ha | 115.53 ha | 140.52 ha | India |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 42.75 ha | 40.61 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 4.28 ha | 0.0064 ha | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, India or Papua New Guinea?
- India, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between India and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 ha, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Papua New Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do India and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- India ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.