Israel vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Israel
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Israel rank
34th
Latvia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Israel
- Latvia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Israel ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.07 ha | 9.43 ha | 1.36 ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.285 ha | 0.8837 ha | 0.5987 ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Israel or Latvia?
- Israel, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Israel and Latvia?
- 0 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Israel ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.