Israel vs Papua New Guinea: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Israel
0 ha
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 ha
in 2024
Israel rank
34th
Papua New Guinea rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Israel
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.95 ha | 1,511 ha | 1,503 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.285 ha | 115.53 ha | 115.25 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 42.75 ha | 42.75 ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | 4.28 ha | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Israel or Papua New Guinea?
- Israel, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Israel and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Papua New Guinea?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Israel ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.