Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Malawi
21.39 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
34th
Malawi rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 21.39 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,003 ha | 1,251 ha | 28,752 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,370 ha | 468.78 ha | 3,902 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 32.31 ha | 42.77 ha | 10.46 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Kazakhstan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 21.39 ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.