Kazakhstan vs Philippines: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Philippines
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
34th
Philippines rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Philippines
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Philippines, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,003 ha | 194.18 ha | 29,809 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,370 ha | 19.02 ha | 4,351 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 32.31 ha | 0 ha | 32.31 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Kazakhstan or Philippines?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Philippines rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.