Kazakhstan vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,003 ha | 312.75 ha | 29,690 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,370 ha | 42.47 ha | 4,328 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 32.31 ha | 0 ha | 32.31 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Kazakhstan or Sri Lanka?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.