Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
27,706 ha
in 2024
Mexico
4,676 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Mexico rank
10th

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mexico
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27,706 ha against 4,676 ha in Mexico, a difference of 23,030 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.9 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 10th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 359,554 ha 35,781 ha 323,773 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 238,587 ha 20,060 ha 218,527 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 132,555 ha 12,034 ha 120,521 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 32,991 ha 13,728 ha 19,263 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mexico?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 27,706 ha against 4,676 ha in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
23,030 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 10th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.