Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
27,706 ha
in 2024
Namibia
17,439 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Namibia rank
6th

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Namibia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27,706 ha against 17,439 ha in Namibia, a difference of 10,267 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 6th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 359,554 ha 105,390 ha 254,164 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 238,587 ha 151,729 ha 86,858 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 132,555 ha 251,644 ha 119,089 ha Namibia
2020s 32,991 ha 195,335 ha 162,344 ha Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Namibia?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 27,706 ha against 17,439 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia?
10,267 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Namibia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Namibia ranks 6th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/namibia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Namibia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.