Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
27,706 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3,724 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27,706 ha against 3,724 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 23,982 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 7.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 359,554 ha 51,667 ha 307,887 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 238,587 ha 155,747 ha 82,841 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 132,555 ha 59,272 ha 73,283 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 32,991 ha 11,269 ha 21,722 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Zimbabwe?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 27,706 ha against 3,724 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
23,982 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/zimbabwe/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.