Latvia vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia rank
34th
Rwanda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.43 ha | 35.93 ha | 26.49 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.8837 ha | 7.23 ha | 6.35 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0 ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Latvia ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.