Liberia vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Liberia
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Liberia rank
34th
New Zealand rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Liberia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Liberia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.45 ha | 17.71 ha | 15.27 ha | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.4531 ha | 9.11 ha | 8.66 ha | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Liberia or New Zealand?
- Liberia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Liberia and New Zealand?
- 0 ha, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Liberia and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Liberia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.