Libya vs Tonga: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Tonga
0 ha
in 2024
Libya rank
34th
Tonga rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Libya
- Tonga
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tonga, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 34th and Tonga ranks 34th of 213 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.68 ha | 0 ha | 22.68 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Libya or Tonga?
- Libya, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Libya and Tonga?
- 0 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tonga?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Tonga rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Libya ranks 34th and Tonga ranks 34th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.