Lithuania vs Polynesia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania rank
36th
Polynesia rank
36th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Lithuania
- Polynesia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 36th and Polynesia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.47 ha | 0 ha | 1.47 ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.15 ha | 0 ha | 0.15 ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area — fao tier 1, Lithuania or Polynesia?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area — fao tier 1 between Lithuania and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Polynesia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Polynesia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Lithuania ranks 36th and Polynesia ranks 36th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.