Lithuania vs South Sudan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania rank
34th
South Sudan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Lithuania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha | 2.67 ha | 2.67 ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Lithuania or South Sudan?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha against 0 ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 0 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and South Sudan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Lithuania ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.