Lithuania vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Lithuania
0 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha
in 2024
Lithuania rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Lithuania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.47 ha | 47.08 ha | 45.61 ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.15 ha | 3.22 ha | 3.07 ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.47 ha | 21.47 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.29 ha | 4.29 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Lithuania or Tunisia?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 0 ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Lithuania ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.