Nepal vs New Zealand: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Nepal
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Nepal rank
34th
New Zealand rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Nepal
- New Zealand
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 522.59 ha | 17.71 ha | 504.88 ha | Nepal |
| 2000s | 21.25 ha | 9.11 ha | 12.14 ha | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Nepal or New Zealand?
- Nepal, at 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Nepal and New Zealand?
- 0 ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and New Zealand rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Nepal ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.