New Caledonia vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
New Caledonia
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
34th
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Caledonia
- Uganda
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.16 ha | 15,463 ha | 15,441 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 17.12 ha | 1,081 ha | 1,064 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 6.42 ha | 21.37 ha | 14.95 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 8.55 ha | 4.27 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, New Caledonia or Uganda?
- New Caledonia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between New Caledonia and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- New Caledonia ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.