New Zealand vs Philippines: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Philippines
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Philippines rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Philippines, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.71 ha | 165.91 ha | 148.2 ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 9.11 ha | 19.02 ha | 9.91 ha | Philippines |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.