New Zealand vs Romania: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Romania
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Romania rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- Romania
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Romania, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Romania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.71 ha | 22.18 ha | 4.47 ha | Romania |
| 2000s | 9.11 ha | 0.8012 ha | 8.31 ha | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, New Zealand or Romania?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between New Zealand and Romania?
- 0 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Romania rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Romania ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.