New Zealand vs Spain: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Spain
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand rank
34th
Spain rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- New Zealand
- Spain
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Spain, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Spain ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.71 ha | 3,826 ha | 3,808 ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 9.11 ha | 2,091 ha | 2,082 ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 554.19 ha | 554.19 ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 799.59 ha | 799.59 ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, New Zealand or Spain?
- New Zealand, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Spain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between New Zealand and Spain?
- 0 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Spain?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Spain rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Spain ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.