Philippines vs Turkmenistan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Philippines
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Philippines rank
34th
Turkmenistan rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Philippines
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 194.18 ha | 760.23 ha | 566.05 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 19.02 ha | 91.86 ha | 72.85 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Philippines or Turkmenistan?
- Philippines, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Philippines and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Turkmenistan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Philippines ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.