Puerto Rico vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Puerto Rico
0 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
34th
Tunisia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tunisia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.02 ha | 41.57 ha | 40.55 ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.1389 ha | 3.22 ha | 3.08 ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.47 ha | 21.47 ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.29 ha | 4.29 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Puerto Rico or Tunisia?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Puerto Rico and Tunisia?
- 0 ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Puerto Rico ranks 34th and Tunisia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.