Saudi Arabia vs Sudan (former): Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Saudi Arabia
0 ha
in 2024
Sudan (former)
0 ha
in 2011
Saudi Arabia rank
34th
Sudan (former) rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.58 ha | 161,174 ha | 161,172 ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 0.073 ha | 33,725 ha | 33,725 ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Saudi Arabia or Sudan (former)?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Saudi Arabia and Sudan (former)?
- 0 ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sudan (former)?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sudan (former) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 34th and Sudan (former) ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.