Spain vs Sri Lanka: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Spain
0 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha
in 2024
Spain rank
34th
Sri Lanka rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,826 ha | 274.59 ha | 3,551 ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 2,091 ha | 42.47 ha | 2,048 ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 554.19 ha | 0 ha | 554.19 ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 799.59 ha | 0 ha | 799.59 ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Spain or Sri Lanka?
- Spain, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Spain and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Spain and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Spain ranks 34th and Sri Lanka ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.