Trinidad and Tobago vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Trinidad and Tobago
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago rank
34th
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uganda
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.51 ha | 15,463 ha | 15,459 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.7947 ha | 1,081 ha | 1,081 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.37 ha | 21.37 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Trinidad and Tobago or Uganda?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Trinidad and Tobago and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.