Turkmenistan vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan rank
34th
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Turkmenistan
- Uganda
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Turkmenistan ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 760.23 ha | 18,146 ha | 17,385 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 91.86 ha | 1,081 ha | 989.57 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.37 ha | 21.37 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Turkmenistan or Uganda?
- Turkmenistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Turkmenistan and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Uganda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Turkmenistan and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Turkmenistan ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.